| Element |
Notes |
| Occupation
Title |
From the U.S.
Dept. of Labor's O*NET classification system. See the
O*NET Resource Center for more information about the
nation's "Occupational Information Network." |
| Subtitle |
Based on my
analysis of common job titles. I've included subtitles whenever the
O*NET titles are inadequate in identifying the occupation. I've also
incorporated the subtitles into the titles listed in the Table of
Contents. |
| Occupation
Description |
From O*NET. |
| Common Job
Tasks |
Originally
from O*NET, but edited/enhanced by me (and my associates). |
| Education and
Training |
Originally
based on a general education level assessment by the U.S. Dept. of
Labor but edited/enhanced by me. Two noteworthy problems I found with
DOL's education level assessments: One, they frequently assessed
lengthy apprenticeship training-based occupations as requiring only
"short term training." Two, they didn't have an education level to
distinguish teaching occupations that require two years of graduate
study and training but don't result in a Masters Degree. So I made
those and other corrections. Note that the education and training
information in my books are general statements intended to reflect the
TYPICAL levels for each occupation. However, some occupations have
jobs that reflect a wide variety of education levels and specific
educational requirements when it comes down to the reality of
individual employers and their hiring/replacement needs. |
| Employment
Outlook |
The
statistics are from the U.S. Dept. of Labor's
Office of Occupational Statistics and
Employment Projections and are for the 10-year outlook
period of 2002-2012. These are the most up-to-date employment
projections available at the time of going to press. (The next update
for these statistics will be in mid-2006.) Note that the titles used
in the projections are from the Standard Occupational Classification
(SOC) system which are sometimes slightly broader in scope than those
used by/for O*NET (although they are always closely related). The
trends analysis is based on a DOL analysis but edited/enhanced by me. |
| Wages |
From the U.S.
Dept. of Labor’s
Occupational Employment Statistics
(OES) program. This program produces estimates of wages by
occupation 2x per year based on a semi-annual mail survey of non-farm
establishments. The collected data are used to produce occupational
wage estimates at the National, State, and sub-State levels. I've
included the average (mean) wages for both the annual and hourly wage
categories. Note that, in the case of teaching occupations, the OES
program only provides an annual wage estimate; therefore, for the
purpose of making occupational comparisons, I have calculated an
approximate hourly wage for these occupations using a general estimate
of 2,000 work hours per year. For the Top 100 Careers book, I
have also included an hourly wage range based on the 25th and 75th
percentiles. The wage data
used in the 2005-2006 editions of my books reflect the most up-to-date
information available as of summer 2004 (which reflects data
originally collected from employers in 2002). |
| Top Employing
Industries |
Based on the
2002-2012 National Industry-Occupation Employment Matrix developed by
the U.S. Dept. of Labor's
Office of Occupational Statistics and
Employment Projections. |
| Most
Important Skills and Abilities |
From O*NET
but edited/enhanced by me. Includes top rated (most important)
knowledge, skill, ability and work activity requirements for each
occupation. |
| Typical
Career Paths |
In this
section I've tried to indicate the “typical” job-to-job career
progression for each career field by using a career lattice visual
(rather than a more conventional career ladder). The lattice implies
what is often the case; namely, that people may start at an entry or
lower-level job, but they don’t always move in a straight line from
left to right, or from bottom to top. The use of terms such as “lower
level,” “mid-level,” and “advanced level” should not be associated
with any particular education levels; rather, they are used to
indicate the general job-to-job progression within that specific
career field. Because career paths are normally comprised of steps
taken from one job to the next job, the career lattice is based on
common job titles (rather than more broadly defined broader
occupational classifications). However, to make the career path
information as useful and comparable as possible, I've also included
occupational information (such as education level, average hourly wage
and - if needed - occupational titles) for those job titles that best
represent the occupational classifications. |
| Career
Dialogues |
The career
dialogues are NOT intended to be representative - nor would they be
nearly as interesting if they were representative! Rather, they are
provided as anecdotal information in which one person who works in
that occupation or career field tells us about their career journey
(so far) and about the occupation (from their perspective). The
dialogues are intended to provide a personal or human touch to the
traditional occupational information which can be difficult for many
people to relate to. If you know of someone who would be a great
interview subject for one of our career dialogues, please let me know! |
| O*NET Codes |
The O*NET
codes will be of interest primarily to career counselors and workforce
development professionals. The first code is the O*NET classification
number for the occupation as indicated by the title and description at
the top of each career profile. The second code is the O*NET
Job Zone, which can be
viewed as a simplification of the Typical Education Levels and/or
Specific Vocational Preparation (SVP) time. The last set of codes are
O*NET
RIASEC codes that indicate
how the occupation rates in terms of basic career interest areas.
RIASEC codes are used by many career counselors to assist their
students or clients in researching occupations that best meet their
career interests. |
| Comparison of
Occupations with Similar Skill Sets |
Based on
O*NET Related Occupations lists (see
O*NET OnLine) but
significantly expanded by me (and my associates) so that each career
profile reflects the 20-40 most closely related occupations in terms
of similar skill sets. To make occupational comparisons more
meaningful, I've also included - in brief - education/training levels,
job growth forecasts, and wage information for all the related
occupations. Note that, sometimes, occupations that are closely
related in terms of career advancement will have very different skill
set requirements. When this is the case, the "related occupations" may
show up in the Typical Career Paths table - but not be included in the
Comparison of Occupations with Similar Skill Sets list. Another thing
worth noting: just because two occupations may have similar skill sets
- that doesn't mean that, if you're qualified for one occupation,
you're also qualified for the other occupation. It simply means that
the two occupations share a lot of skills in common. But then you have
to look deeper at the individual occupations to find out what their
full set of qualifications are (including education and training
requirements). |